Which setting is NOT included when defining dangerous weapons?

Private residences are generally not included when defining dangerous weapons in the context of public policy and laws regarding weapon possession. This is primarily because individuals typically enjoy greater rights within their own homes compared to public spaces. The legal standards around dangerous weapons often focus on public safety considerations, which are more relevant in environments like sporting events, public parks, or political rallies where large gatherings occur and the potential for conflict or harm exists.

Conversely, in private residences, individuals are typically allowed to possess and store firearms or other weapons in a manner considered acceptable by law. This distinction underscores the legal principle that private property rights often afford individuals a higher level of autonomy regarding personal security measures and possessions. Thus, the definition of dangerous weapons is less likely to apply to the private sphere compared to communal and public areas where the risk of harm can affect a larger number of people.